The difficulty of teaching doctors a bioethical block of disciplines (ethical and legal, related to communication, patient-centeredness) lies in the ambiguity of the ethical categories themselves, which differ both historically and culturally. The deontological imperative, which could become a universal measure of the ethical, has similar limitations and, even if it successfully fulfills a normative function, can lead to moral suffering if its implementation is impossible. Other versions of metaethics also have limitations. Additional complexity is created by the starting point for designating a norm in bioethics - the definition of health, which has a biopsychosocial nature. All together, this turns out to be a serious challenge for teaching the bioethical block of disciplines. A possible solution is virtue, the formation of a “virtuoso doctor” capable of coping with ethical relativism - that inevitability that is always present in interpersonal relationships.